1 |
formulate questions to generate new data |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
2 |
recognize perceived self interests of everyone involved in or affected by incident |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
3 |
define physical changes produced during incident |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
3a |
define pre-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
3b |
document post-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
3c |
define physiological changes (injuries) during incident |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3d |
define pre-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
3e |
document post-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
4 |
Identify "actors" involved in an occurrence |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
5 |
define and order data acquisition tasks |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
6 |
protect data sources against premature change |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
6a |
identify/protect physical objects likely to change |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
6b |
identify/protect people data at risk |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
6c |
control personal risks to investigator |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
70 |
define actions required to produce observed conditions |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
71 |
Acquire data about interactions from witnesses |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
72 |
acquire data about interactions from object sources |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
77 |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids - photographs |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
77a |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids - sketches |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
77b |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids - drawings |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
77c |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids -maps |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
77d |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids -charts or graphs |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
80 |
transform observations into documentable format |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
81 |
organize events sequentially |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
81a |
break down/decompose events |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
81b |
transform observations into form entries |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
prepare narrative description of what happened |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
83 |
define events sets/pairs |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
84 |
apply cause-effect logic to events sets |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
84a |
show causal links among events in sets |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
84b |
define gaps in events flow logic |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
86 |
hypothesize bounded scenarios to fill gaps |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
87 |
acquire data to verify hypotheses |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
88 |
perform necessary/sufficient logic to event sets |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
distinguish relevant from irrelevant events/data |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
15 |
use events sets to define problem relationships |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
16 |
use events sets to evaluate problems/needs |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
17 |
select problems to address with recommendations |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
18 |
identify candidate actions to address problems |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
19 |
use events sets to evaluate candidate recommendations |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
20 |
develop rationale for selecting needed recommendations |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
21 |
develop recommendations effectiveness assessment plans and procedures |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
22 |
do objective quality assurance procedures for investigation outputs |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
22a |
do objective quality assurance procedures investigation process |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
23 |
prepare credible report |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
90 |
respond to media inquiries |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
24 |
select investigation methodology/protocols |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
25 |
design AI tasks to take full advantage of available resources. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
26 |
keep energies focused on remaining unknown events |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
61 |
set daily task priorities for each investigator or group |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
60 |
manage work force performance |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
62 |
assure needed information exchanges among workers |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
63 |
conduct public and private briefings |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
64 |
manage quality assurance procedures for team tasks and outputs |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
65 |
manage recommendation development process |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
66 |
manage report preparation |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
101 |
implement multinational investigating protocols |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
8 |
8 |
|
102 |
implement customs and conventions of host states |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
103 |
manage multicultural multinational investigation teams |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
1100 |
negotiate participation by non-government experts |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
40 |
adopt investigation process critique criteria |
|
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
41 |
critique investigation process performance |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
42 |
develop investigation improvement proposals |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
43 |
upgrade investigation procedures |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
Ludwig Benner, Jr. Initial project plan, framework
Jeremy Dawson - information about forms, tasks