IDENTIFYING
USER ACTION NEEDS
WITH STEP-MES MATRIX ARRAYS
For Use During STEP-MES-Based Investigations
Reading time is about 20 minutes.
Table of Contents
OBJECTIVE APPLICABILITY DATA REQUIRED DATA SOURCES USER ACTION NEEDS STATEMENTS FINDING DATA FOR USER ACTION NEEDS STATEMENTS PREPARE THE UANS DOCUMENTS
INTRODUCTIONAfter episodes occur, the many users of data produced by investigators need to determine what response actions they need to take to achieve their objectives. This requires analysts to identify the episodic actions, interactions, linkages and outcomes on which to base their responses. Their responses may take the form of new regulatory action, action recommendations, claims settlements, prosecution, new training material, design changes, policy changes, etc.
select specific data needed as inputs for user actions development, prepare User Action Needs Statements for use in developing user responses to episode Development of User Action Needs Statements (UANS) in response to episodes requires an investigator to thoroughly describe what happened, and comunicate that description promptly, efficiently and effectively to users. The STEP-MES Matrix array provides this description in a format that lends itself well to systematically finding data BBs and links needed to support the UANS development process.[1] The same BBs and I/O pairs or sets used to test the quality of the Matrix array are used to find candidate data to support UANS developmoent. While they have some commonalty, these UANS development procedures differ in major ways from the investigation procedures used to develop the description of the occurrence. Investigations to determine what happened are retrospective; the investigator must figure out what happened during a historic episode from "historical" data, after the fact. User actions, on the other hand, are designed to influence future actions and performance, and therefore are predictive in nature. Other differences include data sources, data acquisition methods, need assessment methods, effectiveness prediction and assessment methods, quality control practices and future monitoring and verification tasks. Writing approaches, styles and contents also differ markedly. All are described in this Guide. OBJECTIVEThe objective of this Guide is to present procedures that can be utilized by investigation report analysts to discover, define and document needs for user action in response to an episode. The analysis outputs are statements of need for user action based on the data in the STEP-MES arrays. APPLICABILITYThis UANS development process can be used during or after any episode where investigators produce a STEP-MES-based matrix array. The procedure for identifying BBs, BB pair or BB sets to develop UANSs from those arrays can be applied by users of any kind of episode's investigation, whether unintentional, willful or natural,, and by individuals with specific interests within a user entity. The vocabulary used may vary, but the process of finding BB data indicating need for action is common for all. . DATA REQUIREDThis user action need identification process requires STEP-MES Matrix arrays with linked BBs in order to function efficiently. The process requires analysts'' understanding of their entity's duties, objectives, and procedures, which drive what they will look for in the arrays. They also need to know how to document a UNAS within their user entity. DATA SOURCESAnalyst's data sources include the STEP-MES-based matrix arrays and at least the following additional sources:
USER ACTION NEED STATEMENTSThe main tasks required to develop a UNAS after the episode is understood and documented are to:
The extent of the documentation should be determined as part of the investigation program plan. The risks and scope of the action need, cost of a response, and sometimes other unique circumstances will dictate the extent and nature of the needs documentation statement. UANS, by design, tend to arouse less emotion than stating needs for action after episodes as problems, causes, inadequacies, violations, lessons learned, errors, failures or pejorative terms in common usage in investigation communities. <br> Statement contentAs a general rule, the contents of a UANS, which must be persuasive to ensure action, would include the following: 1. Description of what happened.The interactions(Links) between [BB (1), BB2B) and BB (n)...] -Stte the BB data from the array that demonstrates the need. 2. Description of activities involved. Explain that the need for action is in the [description of the functional activity, such as operation, design, maintenance, staffing, policy, supervision, etc. - define the organization function in which the need arose to indicate who "owns" the need and will be responsible for addressing it. - use "demonstrate," "indicate" or "suggest" a need for sction, depending on the strength of the logic supporting the definition of the system/subsystem/activity - use additional attributes to define the specific system or subsystem 3. Description the system or obligation within which the need exists or 4. Description the systems whose interactions during the episode create the need.
5. Description of what the need is.
- state the logic which explains the need 6. Explanation of why it needs to be fixed.
7. Description of what needs to get done.
- ensure that wording is compatible with tracking and followup actions
FINDING DATA FOR USER NEEDS STATEMENTS1. Locate, define and annotate a BB, link, BB pair or BB sets for which user action is required.In this discussion, the reference to "needs" is intended to encompass all the STEP-MES matrix array contents for which some user action might be indicated. The selection of the contents to mark up depends on user's goals and data needs. Therefore, the markup task should be performed by a user ANALYST, timed to meet the user's functional needs. A safety analyst will look for problem BBs, links, BB pairs or BB sets that are candidates for change to reduce future risks. An insurance analyst will look for BBs, links, BB pairs or BB sets that will support action on claims. A plaintif's analyst will look for actions or omissions that can form a basis for litigation. A trainer will look for options to change training to improve performance. A designer will look for behaviors that indicate a need for redesign. A system operator will look for problems to correct before system restart. Other users will seek data to support their nees. Over the years, I have observed 36 different users of investigation data, and my list is probably not exhaustive. The STEP-MES matrix array can serve all users. Except perhaps the public which is looking for "the cause" of the episode. 2. General approachThe general approach is to consider each BB and link in succession, consider if it is needed by the user, and tag each BB, link, BB pairsor BB sets if the analyst decides user action is needed. First, develop candidate statements of need that could be addressed by the user actions. A user action need is something a user must do in response to the episode. A candidate statement of need is the documentation of why user action is necessary. Every BBs, linked BB pair or set and link should be examined to determine if a candidate need statement should be developed from the relationship.Another way of looking at this task is the view it as a action needs discovery and definition task. This procedure describes the UANS task.
3. The procedure
b. Define needs. For each BB pair, ask two questions about the BBs and their link:
The general STEP-MES needs definition strategy is to try to identify possible changes to the elements of each BB set which would change the process interactions. To achieve the change, action to "de-link" the BBs is needed, so the relationships described will not occur in the future. Thus, the need is defined by the actions which would change future interactions. De-linking can mean changing either BB in the pair or their linkage. BBs may need to be changed in any of several ways. For example, a BB's timing might need to be earlier, later, or not occur at all. Its duration might need to be longer, shorter or otherwise different. Its intensity might need to be stronger, weaker or different. Its location might need to be different, or its magnitude might need to be reduced if its influence on the next BB has to be changed. These are a few examples of how needs might be defined.
The numbered "needs diamond" attached to a BB or link is the record of the analyst's consideration of that BB and link during this procedure. If the same need is found at another BB, use a different number but define the need with the same words. Alternatively use the same number with a suffix such as 1a, 1b, so analysts can identify common needs by sorting on numbers, and yet know exactly where they were identified. However, individual numbers are preferred. Where the recommended action development tasks are assigned to a single individual or group, it may be preferable to serially number every candidate need without restarting each diamond series in a new investigation with a 1. Wheen the user response action development tasks are assigned to a single individual or group, it may be preferable to serially number every candidate need without restarting each diamond series in a new investigation with a "1." The choice depends on the manner in which the information is to be stored and retrieved, which varies from organization to organization. d. Work through BB pairs. After all needs statements have been completed for the first BB pair, continue through the STEP-MES Matrix array to identify the needs indicated by each BB pair or link. The reason for looking at all the BB pairs is to ensure that no candidate needs will be overlooked - to minimize errors of omission. Remember to note each need with its own number in the diamond attached to the BB or link which demonstrates the need.
Figure 8-1 shows the general layout of the BBs, links and Diamonds on an MES Matrix array. The configuration is the same in software matrix arrays, but the appearance may be different.
e. Review analyses. When the analyst reaches the last BB pair on the left of the Matrix, it is a good idea to review the marked-up array with another qualified person to verify that all the user action needs have been identified. Alternatively, a second person could repeat the work analysts have done to verify the completeness of the user action needs identification task, and the results compared and harmonized. The main quality control procedure is to review the UANSs to ensure that they state each user action need in terms of the actions needed, and not in terms of a problem. PREPARE THE UANS DOCUMENTSUpon completion of the quality assurance steps, the last task is to prepare the User Action Needs Statements for each selected need. When the statements are completed, check the content of each to ensure it contains the:
2. Description of activities involved. 3. Description the system or obligation within which the need exists or 4. Description the systems whose interactions during the episode create the need. 5. Description of what the need is. 6. Explanation of why it needs to be fixed. 7. Description of what needs to get done. When all the candidate UANS have been completed, and the Matrix array contains all the numbered diamonds corresponding to the UANS, analysts should be ready to proceed to the selection of needs to address by proposed user actions.
|